Skip to content

Eric J

@ericj@neodb.social

I like movies and music in probably like a 65/35 split. I like food of all kinds but have no desire to learn how to cook.

neodb.social keeps a catalogue of its own, so what this account watched shows here. Only films and series do: anything else it logs stays on its server. It hands out only this account's most recent posts, so the counts below are what has reached this server, and they fill in as the account logs more. Open the original profile

The Devonsville Terror 1983

1h 22m Horror Rated 3.0 out of 5

I love a good witch story and I enjoy Donald Pleasence and this is pretty alright.

I appreciate the strong feminist angle this takes. I like that almost all of the men are cartoon villains. I love the lore they try to build. I don't love how this is only 83 minutes long but I felt almost every one of them.

Perhaps a rewatch will make it all better?

Blood Tea and Red String 2006

1h 10m Animation Rated 4.0 out of 5

The "folk" aspect of this folk-horror is the dreamy fairytale-like setting, the "horror" part is a fable about the commodification of art or self or beauty or womanhood or all of the above.

Beyond the movie: If there's a theme or takeaway to the disc (which also houses Litan) this is on in the All the Haunted Be Ours Vol. 2 box set, for me it would be that with a strong will or an idea and someone who believes in you, you can do or create anything, and I think that's a lovely thought.

To tie that idea into this title: It took Christiane Cegavske 13 years to make this beautiful, touching, heartbreaking - yet often fun - movie. I'm glad it exists.

Litan 1982

1h 28m Fantasy Rated 4.0 out of 5

There's a lot of "what the...?!" happening in this movie, and when it ended I was very much in the a camp of "I have no idea what that was", but days later I'm still thinking about it, and I really appreciate that nothing is explained in any satisfactory sense and that the satisfaction one should get from the movie comes from making it make sense.

It's a trip and I'm glad to have taken it.

The Last Voyage of the Demeter 2023

1h 59m Horror Rated 3.0 out of 5

It's a little boring, and I immediately thought of a thousand different and better ways that it could've ended, and it probably could've been about 10 or so minutes shorter, BUT I thought it was beautifully shot and that the actors did their best with what they had.

Cool looking Count helps, just what a blah ending, though, gah!

Bram Stoker's Dracula 1992

2h 8m Romance Rated 3.5 out of 5

There are various levels of acting on display in this lush and incredibly horny version of Dracula, it's hard not to be distracted by it.

I was hovering around a 3 for most of its runtime, but the last 20 minutes in the snowy Carpathian mountainside are so beautiful, I was moved to 3.5.

Dracula 1979

1h 49m Romance Rated 4.0 out of 5

Still working my way through my list of 13 Dracula/Nosferatu movies that I made, and after watching this I discovered a minor misordering on my part: This movie starts with the ship that Count Dracula was on running aground; I should've watched The Last Voyage of the Demeter> (2023) first.

At any rate, it's been a fun experience watching so many of these in such a short time and really being able to pick up on the differences and seeing what each writer and director wanted to focus on, as well as how each actor (in every role, really) wanted to play it.

I didn't think I would like Frank Langella's portrayal of the Count going into this, and it did take me a while to get used to how fluffy his hair is, but he actually turned out to be a really great Dracula. I also found him and Kate Nelligan's Lucy to have pretty palpable chemistry. A later scene between them takes a bit of a psychedelic turn I wasn't expecting, but it was so well done that I'd recommend watching this for that alone.

I feel like Willem Dafoe may have taken some of what Laurence Olivier did with Van Helsing here and injected his von Franz in Nosferatu (2024) with it. Not a bad thing!

No one will remember me bringing up Donald Pleasence's choice to eat in every scene in Nosferatu in Venice (1988), but interestingly it seems that he's done it here first (different character, but still).

I could probably be talked up to a 4.5! This was better than I expected it to be, to the point of me wondering why it seems as though this isn't as popular as others.

Count Dracula 1970

1h 38m Horror Rated 4.0 out of 5

I'm probably closer to a 3.75 really, but this has a great score that accompanies some decent visuals (almost-but-not-quite-as-good as (Horror of) Dracula's). Christopher Lee once again provides a decent Drac, but I found I didn't care so much for Van Helsing here (he's no Cushing, that's for sure) and Klaus Kinski felt wasted as Renfield.

Pretty good mostly faithful adaptation!

The Housemaid 2025

2h 11m Mystery Rated 2.0 out of 5

Not feeling well after getting flu/COVID shots, my wife wanted to watch something she didn't have to think about, and boy did she get it.

It's not great, but at least there's a lot of it (this is like 20 minutes too long).

One of these stars is for Amanda Seyfried alone, but if I think about this as more like the origin story for a comic book hero, then it almost sort of makes it a little bit better, so two stars.

Dracula 1958

1h 22m Horror Rated 4.0 out of 5

This one's great(!), though enough liberties were taken with the basic Dracula story that I prefer the title on the movie's title card, Horror of Dracula.

The colorful visuals don't detract from the gothic setting, but instead give this a bit more of a fairy tale look that I really enjoyed. Everyone is great in their roles (shout-outs to Christopher Lee's Count, John Van Eyssen's Harker, and Peter Cushing's Van Helsing), and the visual effects (neck bites, bloodshot eyes, burning up into ash in the sun) were quite effective.

Worth watching if you can!

You Can See Everything 2026

2h 54m Documentary Rated 5.0 out of 5

Regarding Elizabeth Holmes: I read the book, listened to the podcasts, and watched the Hulu show. It was, at the time, a story I found fascinating, just the amount of deception happening. Confounding.

Regarding Nathan Fielder: I'm familiar with him in that I've seen clips of things, but I've not watched any of his shows in full. No particular reason as to why or why not, as he seems like a guy whose output I'd enjoy, I just haven't is all.

Regarding Billy Evans: There are worse people in this world that have more power than he ever will, but he's a pretty great amalgam of all of them. What an absolute fuckhead.

Regarding the doc itself: I'm honestly probably more like a 4 or 4.5 on the content - I would've liked to have heard more from Liz's dad, for instance - but there are so many layers to try and unpack here (can anyone truly know anyone? what is truth/belief/deception?), and then it goes in directions one really can't expect, so in the execution of it all it's hard not to give it the full 5.